![]() |
| The real highlight of the episode: Marsha Thomason as Diana |
Sorry to have missed last week, Collars, but I was on
vacation in a Foreign Land, and even though I’d downloaded the ep, I just was
too jet lagged to concentrate properly. So here’s the Squee for Honor
Among Thieves, one week late – I’ll post the one for Identity
Crisis tomorrow.
The FACE! Poor,
poor grieving Neal. Matt Bomer gives such terrific sad!face, I want to just hug
him for days. And days. I am also v. squeeful, for it gave our many talented WC
vidders some more sad!Neal footage to use – huzzah!
![]() |
| Dear Matt Bomer: Free hugs, apply within. XOXO, RC67. |
![]() |
| Rebecca Mader as Abigail - a great baddie. |
Diana! Aww, so it
looks like the fairy tale romance with Christy is over, which makes me v. sad, and
not just because I was looking forward to the bachelorette party Neal had
promised to throw. Howevs, I was very happy to see not only a bit of character development
for Diana, but the opportunity for Marsha Thomason’s talent to be showcased. Diana’s
frustration with Christy, the thrill even flirting a little bit with Abigail gave
her, and the deep, soul-bending regret at the ending of her relationship were
honest and well-played and I must bow to Marsha’s talent in conveying it all.
It was kind of breath-taking – I hope we see more opportunities for the
secondary characters to bring this kind of quality work to their performances
in the rest of the season.
![]() |
| I just loved this shot - it has no bearing on this article. |
Non-Squee of the Week: Haven’t
we been here before?
Neal, Neal, Neal. I thought you were going to do this Peter’s
way for now? I guess “now” lasted all of 12 hours. Bringing Peter in from the
start, when Neal was first approached by Abigail would have gotten him the
result he was after, I think. But this non-squee isn’t about the characters’
behavior, it’s about the writers’.
Wasn’t this plot device just the music box all over again? I
know that Jeff Eastin has said the show isn’t fun unless Neal and Peter are at
odds (a contention I disagree with, but I’m not the show’s creator), but after
all these men clearly mean to each other, and the lengths they’re willing to go
to support each other, it felt false and very out of character for Neal to have
pulled this gig and not clued Peter in, particularly since he was going to rat
Abigail out anyway. Neal had at least two opportunities to talk to Peter about
it – when he was first approached (and I appreciate his reluctance there – the promise
to get what he needed to find Sam was a strong one, and would have made me
pause as well); and when Abigail blackmailed him – hasn’t Peter earned his
trust enough for him to have confided this to him?
And for Peter to suspect Neal of pulling a long con on him?
I suppose there’s precedent for his jumping to such conclusions in the past
(ahem, blown up treasure, ahem), but I would have thought he’d learned his lesson
about that from the tragic chain of events his false accusation of Neal kicked
off last time (and for the record, I do not believe Neal was conning Peter this time at all). So, to me this sloppiness on the writers’ part is a slap in
the face to the growth and trust the characters have earned from each other,
and certainly to the faith we as fans have put in them. A big miss, show. Shippy shame.
![]() |
| Elizabeth and Peter take a jump and there conclusion lie. |
Second Non-Squee of the
Week: Neal mourns (practically) alone?
Again I address the writers as well as I think the production
on this: I appreciate that hauling out the entire cast for the opening sequence
might have cost some bucks, and perhaps there was a dramatic decision made to
highlight how alone Neal must feel in all of this, but I find it difficult to
believe that June and Elizabeth, at the very least, wouldn’t have insisted on
supporting Neal in his hour of need at Ellen’s funeral. Shippy, shippy shame!
Quote of the week:
Peter: “Why not tonight?”
Neal: “If this is about you and Elizabeth, I don’t want to
get involved.”
Oh but Neal, we want
you to. We do.
Well, OK, so this was more Non-Squee than Squee, which I
suppose sums up the episode for me. It’s sure to be pivotal in the story arc
for the season, but I was v. disappointed in the writers this time out. What
say ye, Collars?





10 comments:
Lol! Love your squees, and I agree completely with your non-squees. I have thought, up until now, that it was realistic to maintain the trusting-but-not-trusting relationship between Peter and Neal--but I think I'm done with it and ready to see both men grow. They've been through too much together for this to keep up.
Agree with post (non-squee) and Rosemary. I can see, tho, why Neal wouldn't think Peter would've believed him. Look at the pink diamond, the jade elephants, the initial uboat heist, etc. Peter hasn't believed him when he was innocent. And even this time, El is saying "at least he didn't shoot anybody" (when does Neal shoot people???) and it's a long con...c'mon writers! Let the characters evolve!
@JRo and @Anon 12:30: Couldn't agree more. I had hoped that WC would be a show where the characters evolve some, where they learn from their mistakes and each other, but apparently, the writers would much rather throw the drama of the week at us without regard to how far these characters have come, and more's the pity. I hope they stop doing this, but with JE putting a new show together, I don't see much promise of any kind of cohesion there.
It is this kind of never-making-any-damn-progress storytelling that put me off Burn Notice (DID he ever find out who burned him? It seemed like there was always someone behind the guy behind the guy... it became exhausting and, more distressingly, BORING).
Please fix this, White Collar!
@Anon 12:30. Neal shot Fowler for Kate's death.
And If Neal had come to Peter before doing anything, Peter would have believed him. After all, Peter believed him afterward, and decided to trust him enough to give him the drive.
Peter has learned from his past mistakes and I wished, after all he has done for Neal lately, that Neal would have trusted him a bit more.
But I do think the characters have evolved. Peter - see above.
Neal - he did turn down the flashdrive. And it didn't take him 10 episodes for him to make his mind.
@anon (August 23, 2012 12:30PM): Yep, there are lots of examples for Peter believing the worst of Neal when it's not justified. I think, though, that El's referring to Neal's actions in "Point Blank" (when he NEARLY shot Fowler)... which is arguably the worst of all Neal's various Bad Acts (either on-air or alluded to in his criminal past).
@RabidChild's comments: great point on "Burn Notice", and the never-ending parade of Bad Guys behind previous Bad Guys. Yes, Michael Westen DID find the guy who "burned" him... but is NOW hunting for the guy who killed THAT baddie just as Michael et al. were about to capture him (and presumably get some answers). So, it looks like (along with OTHER spoilers) there's yet another Bad Guy Behind The Curtain. Going by the latest "Next Week On..." previews, the latest Big Bad has the power to call in air-strikes by fighter jets on a civilian target on U.S. soil, which stretches the Suspension-Of-Disbelief Bungee well past the breaking point for me. (They stretch credibility too much already with all the incidents of supposedly-legitimate CIA agents running ops on U.S. soil, which should be the jurisdiction of the FBI and Homeland Security...) I'm still watching it, though it's a second- or third-tier fandom for me (watch eps only once each, don't seek out fanfic or fan-sites like this one, and may not buy the next DVD set when I see it at CostCo).
@Rosemary: Agree 100% with your comments.
@RabidChild: great Squeee, and great examination of why there's also too much Non-SQUEEE.
One question, totally unrelated to the current topic: how does Google choose ads to include with e-mailed Updates from this site? Do the site Admins have any ability to control which ads are sent to subscribers?
I ask because I got a link to a nasty, "Swift-boat"-style anti-Obama ad in the e-mail for today's Squeee. If you have any ability to influence what ads Google runs in connection with "White Collar Fixation" posts and notifications, I'd suggest cutting ALL political ads during the current election.
@ebebeezerdark In theory, I have both political and religious ads blocked. When some slip through, it annoys me as well. The only political side we take is a pro-gay marriage stance. (And the only religious side we take is to wish people a happy on various holidays.)
Anyway, thanks for letting me know! I'll see what I can do.
I agree with you regarding these never ending trust issues. But let's remember that Mozzie is always in the way with his issues & he might rearrange the wording but he get Neal into hot water just the same. Neal is still struggling with the straight & narrow. Peter & the long con crap needs to back up & realize that Neal has changed & needs just a bit of his trust. One last thing: Peter get's kidnapped & when found & safe Neal hugs him. Neal runs on Peter's dime & when found Peter hugs him. When Neal's surrogate mother is horribly murdered & Neal is crying at the gravesite, no hug, no touch, no tear wipe, just a sweet smile & something to make him smile. Eastin & company dropped the ball here. Not only werre there people at the funeral of a woman who had been a WitSec ghost for over 25 years, but they got Matt to bring on real tears/crying & then edited out all but "a couple of tears & a lip wibble". No chance for the viewers to grieve with Neal or see how much he trusts Peter to lean on him at this time.
Yes! This is the best commentary I've seen on the ep. I totally agreed with you on so many issues, most particularly the 'we've been here before' part. Shame on the writers for being so unoriginal. This tension thing is ridiculous. After the relationship established during the first 4 episodes of the season, it seemed so utterly forced. Let the distrust go!
I don't agree that this was like season 3...there were parallels, but I think they were there deliberatly to show the development in Neal and Peter. In season 3, did Neal think one second about the consequences for Peter, if he run? No, he didn't. He decided against it, but mostly because HE wanted the chance to go back to New York, Peter's fate didn't figure into his decision one second. This time, it did. And Peter is no longer "I don't believe him.", he is now "I believe him, but I'm not sure I should." It's a small process, but, well, Neal is still Neal and Peter is still Peter.
Post a Comment